Top 10 Test Coverage Tools In 2025
Test coverage tools check the extent of code coverage achieved during testing. They provide reports on the lines of code covered, test cases executed, testing completion criteria, and errors. These reports are valuable for regression testing, helping to ensure that new changes do not introduce any bugs.
Let’s further explore some automation test coverage tools with their features, pros, and cons to select the best tool for your testing needs.
10 Best Automated Test Coverage Tools
1. ACCELQ
ACCELQ is a codeless test automation platform that enhances test coverage across applications. It streamlines testing process automation to achieve high test coverage without much scripting. ACCELQ enables continuous testing and E2E automation to find defects early in the software development lifecycle. It integrates with popular tools to provide test coverage insights, improving quality management. With AI-driven automation, ACCELQ can speed up release cycles and maintain high software quality.
Features:
- Enables codeless test automation, allowing non-technical users to create and execute tests.
- Test design, execution, and tracking are unified to streamline processes and collaboration.
- Uses AI-driven automation to optimize test coverage, scenario variations, and execution across platforms.
- Analytics-based algorithms for automated test planning and gap analysis are supported.
- Auto-generates test cases using AI-driven data permutations for comprehensive coverage.
- Support in-sprint automation, aligning with Agile and DevOps for continuous integration and delivery.
- Bi-directional traceability between test cases, execution results, and user stories is provided.
- Features self-healing test automation that adapts to application changes, reducing maintenance efforts.
Pros & Cons of ACCELQ
- ACCELQ Connect syncs test coverage insights with JIRA for real-time traceability
- Unified automation for web, mobile, API, & desktop
- Enables two-way linking of test cases, results, and requirements for better validation
- Test planning and analytics may require framework knowledge
- Some workflows need manual input due to automation limits
- Additional setup is needed for on-premise environments
2. Smartbear Zephyr
Zephyr can plan, execute, and automate tests across Jira projects. The tool manages test coverage.
Features:
- It is one of the test coverage tools for automation testing that supports BDD testing tools for efficient test execution.
- Enables cross-project test case reuse in Jira, streamlining regression testing.
- Automates Jira test result synchronization, eliminating manual status updates and improving traceability.
- Customizable reports with filters and visuals provide insights into pass/fail rates and test coverage.
- Structured workflows for test execution, result tracking, and test cycle management are offered.
Pros & Cons of Smartbear Zephyr
- Auto-syncs test results and defects in Jira
- Streamlined test management with filters and bulk actions
- Visual insights to track failures and refine strategies
- No bulk copy-paste, making test case duplication inefficient
- Limited control over test metrics and custom reports
- Manual steps required for test case updates
3. XRay
XRay is a test management tool for Jira. The tool can also track test coverage and results from automated tests.
Features:
- One of the automated test coverage tools supports manual and automated test creation, organization, planning, and execution.
- Imports test definitions from Excel (CSV) for manual and automated tests.
- Integrates with Cucumber to import scenarios and scenario outlines.
- Tracks changes across all test artifacts to maintain test integrity.
- Generates Xporter (DOCX/PDF reports) and EazyBI (advanced reports).
Pros & Cons of XRay
- Reuses preconditions to reduce duplication
- Structured test sets improve management
- Tracks requirement coverage for better traceability
- No per-project settings; applies globally
- Test cases may become disorganized during execution
- Steep UI learning curve affects navigation and management
4. TestPad
TestPad tool is used for test case management. It can also be used for regression and user acceptance testing.
Features:
- Keyword-driven editor for rapidly creating and managing hundreds of test prompts.
- Guest testing support allows users to execute tests without requiring login credentials.
- Integration with Jira and Github records issues against test results.
- Admin-privileged testing ensures features are accessible only to authorized users.
- Test reporting enables users to generate, save, or print reports for auditing purposes.
Pros & Cons of TestPad
- Mind maps enable structured test planning and identify gaps
- Hierarchical organization improves test management
- Real-time tracking updates execution status, reducing manual effort
- Adding new test cases requires manual effort
- Limited test flexibility due to rigid test structures
- Report delays occur with large test suites
5. PractiTest
PractiTest is a test management platform that offers end-to-end coverage. It provides a centralized hub for all QA information.
Features:
- AI-powered solutions use advanced machine learning algorithms to optimize testing processes.
- Time-progress graphs track execution status and test run time to optimize automation.
- A dynamic data management system enables filing, organizing, searching, and viewing testing artifacts.
- Integration with various bug tracking and test automation tools is supported.
- The FireCracker module generates execution reports for test performance analysis.
Pros & Cons of PractiTest
- Hierarchical filters for organized data access
- Detailed dashboards for execution insights
- Multi-layer security for data protection and control
- Steep learning curve due to configuration complexity
- Limited mobile accessibility for test management
- Third-party tool integration may need customization
6. Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest supports test management, operations, and analytics. The platform centralizes testing and orchestrates quality quickly, with visibility across the software development lifecycle.
Features:
- Plans and organizes testing based on project schedules, ensuring structured execution.
- Automates test management tasks with configurable workflows that trigger updates across Agile and DevOps tools.
- Schedules and executes automated tests across the network.
- qTest Scenario enables Agile teams to scale BDD.
- Provides interactive heat maps to analyze test coverage and identify application defects quickly.
Pros & Cons of Tricentis qTest
- Custom fields and rules for flexible test management
- Distributed test execution boosts coverage
- Real-time dashboards for test and defect tracking
- Limited filters make defect search time-consuming
- Requires manual queries, making report generation tedious
- Some CI/CD and automation tools need custom connectors
7. TestMonitor
TestMonitor, one of the automated test coverage tools, can streamline each step of the QA process. It manages test cases and test runs.
Features:
- Risk management ensures that the software meets user’s needs.
- Structured test case management to improve test coverage and traceability.
- Execution and tracking of test runs for real-time progress monitoring.
- Integrated issue tracking for seamless defect reporting and resolution.
- Built-in reporting to analyze, visualize, and share test results effectively.
Pros & Cons of TestMonitor
- Built-in issue tracking for streamlined defect handling
- Supports requirements to align tests with goals
- End-to-end coverage from planning to execution
- Only cloud hosting, limiting on-premises deployment options
- Steep learning curve requiring time for user adaptation
- No dedicated discussion forums for community support
8. TestRail
TestRail is a test case management tool. This tool is used by QA engineers and developers to manage, track, and organize software testing.
Features:
- A centralized test repository organizes, manages, and tracks automated and manual test cases in folders.
- Reuses test cases across many test runs and copies test cases to new suites or projects.
- Log test results per test step, capture testing times, and include other attachments to provide context.
- Upload results from test automation workflows running in build pipelines on any CI tools.
- Cross-project reporting compares test activity across projects, test plans, and runs.
Pros & Cons of TestRail
- Reusable test cases with cross-project traceability
- CI integration and API-based test result imports
- Custom reports linking requirements, tests, and defects
- Setting up integrations, roles, and projects takes time
- Excessive options make navigation tedious for new users
- Restrictions on test templates, automation flows, and reporting
9. Qase
Qase is a test management platform for manual and QA automation. The platform can orchestrate defect management, test plans, and test runs with informative reports.
Features:
- Customizable drag-and-drop widgets for test case management.
- Test setup wizard for guided configuration.
- A unified workspace integrates various testing activities and tools.
- Shareable report links for seamless collaboration.
Pros & Cons of Qase
- Easy test case organization with drag-and-drop widgets
- Detailed test data tracking for better debugging
- One-click dashboard sharing with report links
- Expensive due to per-user pricing
- Integration issues with some CI/CD tools
- Limited automation support for complex tests
10. TestLink
TestLink is a test management tool that streamlines test case creation. It supports manual and automated execution of test cases.
Features:
- This tool creates test cases and manages them for complete test coverage.
- Powerful search functionality with Hotkeys for quick navigation.
- Rally and VersionOne integrations are supported for managing projects.
- The tool offers reports of test case execution.
Pros & Cons of TestLink
- Seamless import and export of test cases in many formats
- Advanced filters by version, keyword, and test ID
- Exports test reports in XML, CSV, and PDF formats
- High learning curve due to a complex user interface
- Requires extra manual configuration for tool integrations
- Outdated user interface with limited modern usability features
How to increase test coverage in Salesforce?
Use the Apex testing framework to generate code coverage numbers for your classes every time you run one or more tests. Write test methods to confirm your code and ensure all possible scenarios are covered. Unit tests must cover at least 75 percent of Apex code, and all tests must pass to deploy Apex in the Salesforce AppExchange.
Code coverage serves as one sign of test effectiveness. The quality of the tests is essential, but using code coverage as a tool can assess whether you need to add tests. While meeting the least code coverage requirements for deploying Apex code, code coverage shouldn’t be the only goal of testing. Tests should assert the app’s behavior and ensure the quality of your code.
Conclusion
ACCELQ is the best platform because it supports comprehensive test coverage. It is a cloud-based test automation platform that extends test coverage for mobile, API, web, desktop, and packaged app testing. Hence, ACCELQ Connect helps testers retrieve test coverage information from the platform into the JIRA environment.
Maximize test coverage with AI-powered automation! See why ACCELQ is a top choice in 2025 — book your free trial today and elevate your QA game!
Chaithanya M N
Content Writer
A curious individual who is eager to learn and loves to share her knowledge using simple conversational writing skills. While her calling is technology and reading up on marketing updates, she also finds time to pursue her interests in philosophy, dance and music.
You Might Also Like:
Top 12 Test Automation Tools of 2025
Top 12 Test Automation Tools of 2025
TOP 15 Test Management Tools In 2025
TOP 15 Test Management Tools In 2025
Top 10 Oracle Cloud Testing Tools 2025