Skip to main content
Logo
    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

10 Best Accessibility Testing Tools to Ensure Inclusive Digital Experiences

Accessibility Testing Tools

20 Jun 2025

Read Time: 6 mins

Accessibility is a matter of equal rights. It aligns with equal opportunities for people with impairments to participate fully in society, including the digital world. The blog covers top accessibility testing tools.

These testing tools help testers ensure that applications, digital content, and websites are accessible to users with disabilities. The tools analyze web pages, documents, or software interfaces to find accessibility issues. It provides recommendations to improve based on accessibility standards like WCAG compliance, ADA compliance, and more. The objective of these tools is to create an inclusive digital environment by checking and recommending the removal of any accessibility barriers.

10 Best Accessibility Testing Tools

ACCELQ is a test automation platform that enables you to make products and applications more accessible to users with disabilities. It can verify web accessibility during test execution. The platform performs each validation contextually for each application page during its automated test execution. Using ACCELQ, you can easily validate web accessibility with a single click. This platform can automate the process of identifying violations of accessibility standards, such as WCAG, across web and mobile platforms.

1. ACCELQ

ACCELQ Logo

ACCELQ is the best AI-powered codeless test automation platform for usability testing. This platform bridges the gap between manual and automated testing, all within a unified platform. It supports automation across Web, Mobile, API, Desktop, Mainframe, packaged apps, and more, making it a versatile tool for usability testing needs. The platform’s intuitive test design and management features ensure seamless collaboration and efficiency. Hence, ACCELQ is the most comprehensive test automation platform for enhancing user experience through thorough and efficient testing.

Features:

  • Design Studio is a test scenario development environment used to develop scenarios automatically in a codeless manner.
  • An AI-powered smart recorder in the Action Logic Editor tool can accelerate testing logic development and record validations.
  • The playback feature lets users instantly validate any test logic.
  • Embed accessibility testing into the functional test cycle to perform test automation on every page for web accessibility validation.
  • The platform can automatically kick off the validation of accessibility parameters at the beginning of each action in the test scenario.
  • Comprehensively validates accessibility parameters as defined by the WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 on level A and AA compliance requirements and a number of best practices.
  • Reporting provides rich visual controls highlighting failing HTML elements and navigation across these elements.

Pros & Cons of ACCELQ

  • Automated testing quickly finds accessibility issues on the application pages
  • Accessibility is checked for all pages touched during functional test automation
  • The report lists all accessibility violations, grouped by severity and failure category
  • No Cons

2. WAVE

Wave Logo

WAVE is a suite of evaluation tools that helps you make the web content more accessible to individuals with disabilities. It can identify Web Content Accessibility Guideline (WCAG) errors and facilitate human evaluation of web content.

Features:

  • Analyzes and identifies friction points that users encounter while interacting with digital products.
  • App store optimization is supported for a better user experience.
  • CRM, development, design and other integrations are supported.

Pros & Cons of WAVE

  • Design and product templates
  • Audience targeting
  • Performance testing is supported
  • No heatmaps
  • Moderated usability testing is not supported
  • No reporting and statistics

3. Google Lighthouse

Google Lighthouse

Lighthouse is an open-source automated tool. It can help to improve web apps’ performance, quality, and correctness.

Features:

  • Stack packs detect your site’s platform and display specific stack-based recommendations.
  • Plugins extend functionality for community-specific needs.

Pros & Cons of Google Lighthouse

  • Runs in Chrome DevTools, from the command line, or as a Node module
  • Audits web pages for performance, SEO, and accessibility
  • Generates a report on web page accessibility issues
  • May not detect if the page title lacks relevant content
  • Uses only color to show error and success messages
  • May miss pop-ups that trap users during navigation

4. EqualWeb

Equalweb Logo

EqualWeb is an accessibility testing tool for web applications. Its technology is based on a powerful AI system that automatically finds and fixes website accessibility issues.

Features:

  • Text resizing.
  • Screen readers.
  • Color contrast adjustments.

Pros & Cons of EqualWeb

  • Optimized accessibility widget doesn't slow down your site
  • The widget works seamlessly on desktop and mobile platforms
  • Video and audio transcripts help users with disabilities engage with content
  • Widget doesn't guarantee full accessibility compliance
  • Warranty only applies with a full remediation plan
  • Costly for small organizations or new websites

5. Accessibility Insights

Accessibility Insights Logo

Accessibility Insights for Web is an extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge. It helps developers to find and fix accessibility issues in web apps and sites.

Features:

  • Visual helper highlights accessibility issues with visual guidance and simple fixes.
  • Live inspect verifies UI automation properties.
  • The color contrast analyzer checks text readability against background colors.

Pros & Cons of Accessibility Insights

  • Fix common accessibility issues in under 5 minutes
  • Checks your site for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards
  • Test Windows apps with the inspect and color contrast analyzer in a single tool
  • Not designed for continuous testing setups
  • Works only as a browser extension for Chrome and Edge
  • May miss accessibility scenarios on complex websites

6. Axe Dev Tools

Axe Logo

Axe Dev Tools is one of the accessibility testing tools for mobile apps. The tool enables automated mobile testing as a part of the release cycle.

Features:

  • Mobile analyzer scans app screens without source code access.
  • SDK and Appium integration with your existing test suite and CI/CD pipeline.
  • Mobile dashboard tracks, reviews, and shares accessibility issues across your apps.

Pros & Cons of Axe Dev Tools

  • The testing checklist helps to find accessibility issues in periodic audits
  • IDE Linter for React Native Apps quickly fixes issues during development
  • Share results with your team without needing a license
  • Sometimes flags issues that require manual verification
  • May miss some accessibility issues that affect content quality
  • Guided tests only come with the Pro subscription

7. Pa11y

pa11y Logo

Pa11y is an automated accessibility testing tool. It runs accessibility tests on your pages through the command line or Node.js so that you can automate the testing process.

Features:

  • A command-line interface loads web pages and highlights accessibility issues.
  • A web dashboard automatically tests web pages daily for accessibility issues.

Pros & Cons of Pa11y

  • CLI runs quick one-off tests on any web page
  • The JSON-based webservice helps to build a dashboard or data reuse
  • Graphs track improvements over time to see how sites perform
  • Does not support all WCAG criteria
  • Lack of cross-browser testing
  • Limited to static analysis

8. DYNO Mapper

Dyno Mapper Logo

DYNO Mapper is a software service that can test the accessibility of the entire website. It can review accessibility problems for each web page to isolate and resolve for an exclusive user experience.

Features:

  • The visualize feature views accessibility tests live in a browser.
  • The schedule feature monitors accessibility problems to enable ongoing automatic testing and reporting on a monthly basis.

Pros & Cons of DYNO Mapper

  • Icons show known and potential issues on your website
  • Online reports are saved and easy to share with sub-users
  • Track your accessibility score and progress using the graph
  • Outdated interface with usability issues
  • Cannot manage the whole website planning process
  • Poor customer support

9. TPGi

TPGi Logo

The TPGi accessibility testing tool can uncover and resolve accessibility issues on any web page. This tool can quickly and efficiently evaluate screens for accessibility.

Features:

  • A visual path highlights tab order to illustrate the end-user experience.
  • Scans individual pages for WCAG conformance failures.
  • Configurable preferences report only important issues.

Pros & Cons of TPGI

  • Simple code suggestions help resolve WCAG errors
  • Web browser extension shows how accessible pages are to screen readers
  • Scales well for identifying and fixing accessibility issues
  • Requires some knowledge of accessibility to use
  • May not work with existing tools or systems
  • Too many options might overwhelm some users

10. LevelAccess

Level access Logo

LevelAccess Platform serves as a core system of record. This platform provides a complete overview of your digital accessibility practice.

Features:

  • Figma plug-in tests the design components.
  • Detailed design evaluations offer accessibility feedback on designs and style guides.
  • API checks code and content for accessibility issues in any setup.

Pros & Cons of LevelAccess

  • Integrates with popular test automation tools for accessibility checks
  • Run automated accessibility scans and store scan results
  • Sends alerts via webhooks when issues are found
  • Finds issues, but manual fixes take time
  • Flags compliance issues but not full accessibility
  • Pricing is expensive

Conclusion

The Digital Accessibility Software Market, valued at USD 670.37 million in 2023, is projected to more than double – reaching USD 1,373.92 million by 2032. This rapid growth underscores a global shift toward inclusive digital experiences. Prioritizing accessibility testing isn’t just a compliance checkbox—it’s a commitment to inclusivity, allowing individuals with disabilities to fully engage with your digital content. In doing so, organizations not only foster equity but also strengthen their brand reputation as champions of diversity and inclusion.

ACCELQ empowers teams to seamlessly integrate accessibility testing into their functional testing cycles. With built-in support for WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 standards, ACCELQ enables one-click validation of accessibility across web pages—eliminating the burden of manual checks across every screen and user path. By automating accessibility validation, teams can ensure consistent compliance, faster feedback, and a more inclusive user experience from the start.

Ready to elevate your digital inclusivity and see how you can accelerate your compliance goals? Book a free demo with our experts today!

Chaithanya M N

Content Writer

A curious individual who is eager to learn and loves to share her knowledge using simple conversational writing skills. While her calling is technology and reading up on marketing updates, she also finds time to pursue her interests in philosophy, dance and music.

You Might Also Like:

BDD in TestingBlogSoftware testingBDD in Testing: Improve Automation & Team Productivity
15 April 2025

BDD in Testing: Improve Automation & Team Productivity

Learn how BDD in testing aligns testing with business goals and streamlines Agile workflows for faster, more efficient software delivery.
Software Testing Conferences 2025BlogSoftware testingTop Software Testing Conferences you must attend in 2025
14 February 2025

Top Software Testing Conferences you must attend in 2025

Explore the top software testing conferences in 2025 and the benefits of attending testing conferences.
Regression Vs Retesting key differencesBlogTypes of TestingRegression Testing and Retesting: Key Differences and Best Practices
1 March 2025

Regression Testing and Retesting: Key Differences and Best Practices

Key differences between Regression Testing and Retesting, their role in software quality, & best defect verification and stability practices.

Get started on your Codeless Test Automation journey

Talk to ACCELQ Team and see how you can get started.