Improving Test Automation Quality Through Code Reviews
In 2022, a CISQ study revealed that the cost of poor software quality in the US was about $2.41 trillion. The study also outlined how the technical debt had reached $1.52 trillion. As the need to roll out quality software to the market fast intensifies, it's essential that organizations adopt practices that alleviate code-related errors and inconsistencies. This is precisely where the concept of code reviews gains prominence.
Code Reviews - A Primer
Code review is a process where developers review each other's code to improve its quality. It helps catch bugs, ensure adherence to coding standards, and enhance collaboration. Different types of code reviews, such as pair programming or formal reviews, can be conducted. In essence, clear guidelines and constructive feedback are crucial for effective code reviews.
Why are Code Reviews Necessary?
Code reviews are necessary for several reasons:
Improving Code Quality & Maintainability
Code reviews provide an opportunity for other developers to examine the code or the new changes to the code and suggest improvements. As mentioned above, this helps identify potential bugs and errors before they make their way into production — ensuring that the code is high-quality. Moreover, the code becomes more maintainable and understandable for developers who might work on it in the future.
Fostering Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration
Code reviews promote collaboration and knowledge sharing within a development team. Reviewers can provide feedback, suggest alternative approaches, or share their expertise, fostering learning and growth among team members.
Establishing Coding Standards
Code reviews enforce coding standards and best practices within a team or organization. Reviewers can ensure that the code follows established guidelines, making it more readable, maintainable, and consistent. Moreover, these established standards help augment developers' skills in suggesting improvements and relaying feedback.
What are the Approaches to Code Review?
As it stands, enterprises can carry out code reviews in the following two ways:
Manual Code Review
Manual code review involves human reviewers carefully examining the code for issues. It can be conducted in various ways, such as:
- Pair Programming: Two developers work together on the same code simultaneously, providing immediate feedback and catching errors in real-time.
- Informal Code Review: Reviewers informally review the code by looking for potential issues, bugs, or improvements. This approach is less structured and can be conducted through discussions, meetings, or code walkthroughs.
- Formal Code Review: A more structured approach where code changes are reviewed by a group of developers. To that end, this can involve using checklists, documented processes, and specific roles (such as a moderator or a designated reviewer).
Automated Code Review
Automated code review relies on specialized tools and software to analyze the code for potential issues. These tools can perform static code analysis and identify common coding errors.
Furthermore, automated code review tools can provide quick feedback on coding issues and help enforce coding standards consistently. However, for more complex and context-specific issues, it's advisable to bring manual reviews into the mix as well.
In essence, both manual and automated code review approaches have their advantages and can be used in combination to maximize the effectiveness of the code review process. While manual reviews provide human insights, expertise, and contextual understanding, automated tools offer speed and consistency in catching common issues. The choice of approach depends on the project, team dynamics, and available resources.
Your business guide to codeless test automation
Ready to execute continuous test automation without writing a single code?
How Do Code Reviews Complement Test Automation?
Code reviews and test automation are complementary approaches to ensure software quality. Here's how code reviews can complement test automation:
Basic Understanding
Code reviews can help ensure that the code is understandable and follows common coding standards. This can aid in the development of automated tests and make it easier to identify issues during testing.
Deciphering Sophisticated Issues
Code reviews can also help identify complex issues that otherwise may remain overlooked using automated tests. These could be bad assertions or configuration issues. Favorably, reviewers with expertise can offer insights and suggestions to improve the quality of the code.
Ensuring Consistent Design and Implementation
Code reviews can prove immensely viable in ensuring that the code is designed and implemented consistently with project requirements. This can reduce the likelihood of issues that may arise during testing and improve the overall quality of the software.
Improving Automation and Quality Assurance
The feedback relayed during the code review process can help improve the codebase and make it more testable, leading to more effective automated testing initiatives.
Best Practices for Running Code Reviews
The following best practices help ensure a smooth and constructive code review process:
Set Clear Objectives
Communicate the goals and expectations of the code review process. Define the purpose of the review, whether it's to catch bugs, improve code quality, or ensure adherence to coding standards.
Establish Guidelines and Standards
Define coding guidelines and standards for your project or organization. This provides a common framework for reviewers to assess the code and ensures consistency.
Keep Code Reviews Small and Focused
Avoid reviewing large chunks of code all at once. Instead, break down the code changes into smaller, manageable units that can be reviewed effectively. This allows reviewers to provide more focused feedback and helps prevent information overload.
Involve the Right People
Include relevant stakeholders and subject matter experts in the code review process. Ensure that the reviewers have the necessary expertise to understand the code and provide valuable feedback.
Provide Context and Documentation
Share relevant information about the code changes, such as the purpose, requirements, or user stories. This helps reviewers understand the context and make informed judgments during the review.
Foster a Constructive and Respectful Environment
Encourage a positive and respectful tone during code reviews. Provide feedback that is specific, actionable, and focused on improving the code rather than criticizing the developer. In sum, foster a culture of learning and improvement.
Use Code Review Tools
Leverage code review tools to enable reviewers to easily navigate and comment on the code changes, making the review process more efficient.
Balance Speed and Thoroughness
Strive for a balance between the speed of code reviews and their thoroughness. Timely reviews are essential, but rushing through them may lead to missing important issues. Therefore, find a balance that suits your team's needs and project timelines.
Track and Address Feedback
Ensure that feedback provided during code reviews is addressed appropriately. To that end, use issue-tracking systems or task management tools to track and follow up on identified issues and ensure they are resolved or incorporated into future iterations.
Learn from the Process
Code reviews are not only about finding errors but also about learning and improving as a team. So, encourage knowledge sharing and discussion among reviewers and developers, and use the feedback from reviews to enhance coding practices and prevent similar issues in the future.
Code reviews serve as a powerful tool for enhancing code quality, fostering collaboration, and promoting continuous improvement in application development and delivery. It pays rich dividends to make code reviews an integral part of your development process.
Nidhi Achhaa
Content Specialist at ACCELQ
Nidhi specializes in technology-based content and strives to create a unique, customized, and compelling piece with a flavor of SEO. A writer with a love for words and a storyteller at heart.
