HP UFT just does not scale up for us with its technology support limitations, customizations, and it is cost prohibitive

accelQ on the other hand is a complete lifecycle automation platform with simple codeless automation and very low maintenance. It has given us the speed we needed to build, maintain automation, and align with continuous delivery.

Selenium being free and open source, seemed like a good idea in the beginning, but we quickly realized that it needs way too many custom frameworks and specialized resources. All this added up to the significant cost and slowed us down.

accelQ provided us the same power as Selenium, but even more flexibility. We are able to test not just UI but also our legacy mainframe applications, backend automation as well as file related validations. AccelQ has an extendible framework which was critical to align with our changing technology stack.

API testing for us was being done well but only at unit level with Postman and SOAP UI. We were not able to achieve any reusability and structure for end-to-end validations

ACCELQ’s API testing brought regression maturity with ability to easily reuse and chain API tests for an integrated automation. ACCELQ also allowed to test UI and API in the same flow. And most importantly, there was no programming needed to build the API regression suite.

We used one of the record and playback tools for our automation. The scripts recorded were mostly throwaway. And even after customizations and scripting, they were not able to handle application business rule validations.

With ACCELQ, we got the ease of recording coupled with a natural language interface which was flexible to handle the most complex rule validation and automation end to end.

Ready to get started?

Experience fast and reliable migration to ACCELQQ from the likes of UFT, Selenium and others

START A FREE TRIAL

HP UFT just does not scale up for us with its technology support limitations, customizations, and it is cost prohibitive

Selenium being free and open source, seemed like a good idea in the beginning, but we quickly realized that it needs way too many custom frameworks and specialized resources. All this added up to the significant cost and slowed us down.

API testing for us was being done well but only at unit level with Postman and SOAP UI. We were not able to achieve any reusability and structure for end-to-end validations

We used one of the record and playback tools for our automation. The scripts recorded were mostly throwaway. And even after customizations and scripting, they were not able to handle application business rule validations.

enterprise platform

Automation Support for Diverse Technology Stack

WEB
TECHNOLOGIES

ERP
PLATFORMS

API
TESTING

MAINFRAME AUTOMATION

BACKEND & MIDDLEWARE

Why ACCELQ

Product

Salesforce

Resources

Pricing

Company

Support

HP UFT just does not scale up for us with its technology support limitations, customizations, and it is cost prohibitive

Selenium being free and open source, seemed like a good idea in the beginning, but we quickly realized that it needs way too many custom frameworks and specialized resources. All this added up to the significant cost and slowed us down.

API testing for us was being done well but only at unit level with Postman and SOAP UI. We were not able to achieve any reusability and structure for end-to-end validations

We used one of the record and playback tools for our automation. The scripts recorded were mostly throwaway. And even after customizations and scripting, they were not able to handle application business rule validations.

enterprise platform

Automation Support for Diverse Technology Stack

WEB TECHNOLOGIES

ERP PLATFORMS

API TESTING

MAINFRAME AUTOMATION

BACKEND & MIDDLEWARE

Why ACCELQ

Product

Salesforce

Resources

Pricing

Company

Support

WEB
TECHNOLOGIES

ERP
PLATFORMS

API
TESTING